Page 291

Proceedings of International Conference on Climate Change, Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services for the Sustainable Development Goals : Policy and Practice 27-29 June 2016 at the Sirindhorn International Environmental Park, Cha-am, Phetchaburi, Thailand

Table  3  Average  carbon  amounts  in  soils  under  DDF  and  MDF Forest Parent rock Soil depth Soil Order Organic carbon type (Mg ha-1) DDF 1. Sandstone Intermediate deep, 80/100 cm Ultisols 12.27 Forest Parent rock Soil depth Soil Order Organic carbon type 2. Volcanic rocks depth Very shallow, 30 cm depth Entisols/Inceptisols (Mg 31.45 ha-1) MDF DDF 1. 1. Sandstone Sandstone Intermediate Deep, 1-2 m depth deep, 80/100 cm Ultisols 49.86 depth Ultisols 12.27 2.1 Shale Shallow, 50 cm depth Inceptisols 52.46 2.2 Shale/limestone Deep, 2 m depth Alfisols/Vertisols 65.56 2. Volcanic rocks Very shallow, 30 cm depth Entisols/Inceptisols 31.45 MDF 1. Sandstone Deep, 1-2 m depth Ultisols 49.86 2.1 Shale Shallow, 50 cm depth Inceptisols 52.46 2.2 Shale/limestone Deep, 2 m depth Alfisols/Vertisols 65.56 4.3  Ecosystem  carbon  storages Table  4  shows  amounts  of  carbon  storages  in  plant  biomass  and  soil.  Total  amounts  in  DDF  varied  from  54.06  to  78.57  Mg  ha-1,  while  MDF  had  higher,  139.82  to  152.92  Mg  ha-1.  In  DDF,  percentages  of  carbon  in  plant  were  60.0  to  77.3%,  while  MDF  had  57.10  to  65.79%.  In  soil,  DDF  had  values  of  22.70  to  40.0%,  while  MDF  had  34.10  to  42.90%.  The  higher  percentages  of  carbon  storage  in  plant  were  observed  in  forest  with  poor  soil,  but  the  storages  in  plant  and  soil  were  nearly  the  same  for  forest  that  had  deep  fertile  soils. Forest Carbon amounts type Parent rock Plant Soil Total Table  4  Carbon  storages  in  plant  and  soil  in  DDF  and  MDF Mg ha-1 % Mg ha-1 % Mg ha-1 % Forest Carbon amounts type Parent rock Plant Soil Total DDF 1. Sandstone 41.79 77.30 12.27 22.70 54.06 100 2. Volcanic rocks 47.12 60.00 31.45 40.00 78.57 100 Mg ha-1 % Mg ha-1 % Mg ha-1 % MDF 1. Sandstone 96.56 65.90 49.86 34.10 146.42 100 DDF 1. Sandstone 41.79 77.30 12.27 22.70 54.06 100 2.1 Shale 87.36 62.90 52.46 37.50 139.82 100 2.2 Shale/limestone 87.36 57.10 65.56 42.90 152.92 100 2. Volcanic rocks 47.12 60.00 31.45 40.00 78.57 100 MDF 1. Sandstone 96.56 65.90 49.86 34.10 146.42 100 2.1 Shale 87.36 62.90 52.46 37.50 139.82 100 2.2 Shale/limestone 87.36 57.10 65.56 42.90 152.92 100 5. Research  application  and  relevance  to  sustainable  development  goals This  research  was  taken  in  a  restored  watershed  managed  by  HHKRDS  Center  to  assess  conditions  of  plant  species  diversity  and  carbon  storages  in  two  deciduous  forests.  The  forests  have  recovered  from  1984,  the  beginning  of  Center  establishment.  Carbon  storages  in  forests  are  increasing  year  by  year  with  plant  growth.  It  is  useful  data  as  a  guideline  for  management  and  study  of  community  forests  in  the  north.  The  watershed  increases  potential  of  water  supply  to  streams  which  is  useful  for  agriculture  in  lower  land  areas  as  well  as  providing  non-wood  forest  products  for  food  and  sufficient  economic  livelihoods  of  villagers.  Thus  this  conservation  of  forest  biodiversity  is  relevant  to  the  sustainable  development  goals.  Proceedings  of  the  International  Conference  on  Climate  Change,  Biodiversity  and  Ecosystem  Services  for  the 289 Sustainable  Development  Goals  (SDGs):  Policy  and  Practice  27-29  June  2016,  Cha-am,  Phetchaburi,  Thailand


Proceedings of International Conference on Climate Change, Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services for the Sustainable Development Goals : Policy and Practice 27-29 June 2016 at the Sirindhorn International Environmental Park, Cha-am, Phetchaburi, Thailand
To see the actual publication please follow the link above