Page 346

Proceedings of International Conference on Climate Change, Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services for the Sustainable Development Goals : Policy and Practice 27-29 June 2016 at the Sirindhorn International Environmental Park, Cha-am, Phetchaburi, Thailand

The  literature  that  is  attracted  by  the  conceptual  magnet  of  climate  change  comes  from  a  staggering  range  of  Scientific  Journals  and  a  host  of  expanding  web  pages.  It  is  way  beyond  the  scope  of  these  Proceedings  to  even begin  to  encompass  this  literature  here.  Against  this  background,  the  contributions  embedded  within  these  ICCBE  Conference  Proceedings,  provide  a  new  relevance  and  importance.  A  key  aspect  of  the  work  reported here  is  the  fact  that  they  are  products  of  scientific  endeavor  in  (so-called)  “developing”  countries.  They  herald  a  welcome  contribution  to  genuine  global  efforts  on  climate  change  and  all  it  brings  in  its  wake.  As  this  synthesis  outlines  the  scope  and  topic  diversity  of  the  papers  encapsulated  in  our  book  of  Proceedings, some  mention  may  be  made  to  indicate  how  these  clearly  Asian  endeavours  can  enrich  those  of  Euro-American  sources  which,  at  present,  tend  to  dominate  the  debate  and  content  of  discourse  on  climate  change. Wisely,  the  Conference  attempted  to  organize  the  36  papers  selected  for  publication  into  five  broad  categories,  viz  – 1. Management 2. Policy  } Within  Biodiversity  3. Practice Conservation and  Ecosystem  Services 4. Multi-stakeholder  approaches 5. Climate  Change  adaptation;  adaptive  learning,  form  Policy  to  Practice. This  categorization  was  useful  but  not  at  all  inflexible:  it  allowed  for  the  often  complex  interactions  between  these  overlapping  categories.  Thus  realism  and  pragmatism  survived. Sustainable  development  means  many  things  to  many  people.  Close  to  the  heart  of  the  concept  sits  the  wise  use  of  ecosystems.  Thus  what  appears  to  be,  on  the  face  value  of  the  36  papers  contained  in  this  book,  a  huge  diversity  of  topics  and  viewpoints,  face  alone  can  be  misleading:  they  are,  in  fact,  all  connected  to  the  same  heart.  And  more:  they  all  seek  to  sustain  the  same  heart.  To  reflect  the  thematic  interconnections  of  all  papers  no  pre-set  sequence  is  followed  in  this  synthesis.  Rather,  this  synthesis  chapter  is  certainly  a  synthesis  and  aims  to  create  a  free-flowing  feeling  for  the  body  of  topics  which  collectively embrace  the  heart  of  the  Conference;  and make a  useful  contribution  to  the  aims  of  the  UN  Agenda  2030. Bulia  Pulu  describes  a  system  of  traditional  eco-agri-economics  followed  by  the  Apatani  people  of  the  Indian  Himalayan  State  of  Arunachal  Pradesh  which  comes  close  to  a  sustainable  anthropocentric  ecosystem.  The  title of  the  paper,  “Practices  of  mitigating  biodiversity loss”  among  the  Apatani  only  conveys  part  of  this  case  study  of  sustainability  in  action.  The  UKNEA:  TR  makes  the  claim  that  much  of  the work  on  the  relationships  between  biodiversity  and  ecosystem  function  has  limitations  in  terms of  understanding  real-world  ecosystems  (Chap  4,  P.66  in  UKNEA,  2010).  This  could  and  perhaps  should  be  described  as  a  Euro-centric  viewpoint;  a  view  that  would  gain  much  from  a  study  the  Bulia  Pulu  paper. Yes,  the  Himalayan agro-ecosystem  is  based  on  rice  but  this  cropping also  embraces  fish  farming,  forest  and  water management,  bio-insecticidal  pest  control  and  culturally  based  eco-aware  community  rules  and  rituals.  On  close  inspection,  this  long-established  integrated  ‘biosphere  reserve’  (a  UNESCO  concept)  system  could  be  seen  as  a  living,  present  day  Asian  version  of  the  long–vanished  English  17  Century  crop  rotation  (four-course)  agro-ecosystem.  Bulia  Pulu  is  correct  when  she  concludes  that,  there  are  many  lessons  that  could  be  learned  (in  fact,  re-learned!)  from  traditional  societies  in  terms  of  agro-ecosystems  and  land  management. Another  lesson  shines  from  Bulia  Pulu’s  paper.  This  is  the  lesson  of  writing  style: 344 Proceedings of the International Conference on Climate Change, Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services for the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): Policy and Practice 27-29 June 2016, Cha-am, Phetchaburi, Thailand


Proceedings of International Conference on Climate Change, Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services for the Sustainable Development Goals : Policy and Practice 27-29 June 2016 at the Sirindhorn International Environmental Park, Cha-am, Phetchaburi, Thailand
To see the actual publication please follow the link above