Page 396

Proceedings of International Conference on Climate Change, Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services for the Sustainable Development Goals : Policy and Practice 27-29 June 2016 at the Sirindhorn International Environmental Park, Cha-am, Phetchaburi, Thailand

Dr.  Payyappallimana  shared  that  the  specific  objectives  of  evaluating  ESD  in  RCEs  are  (1)  to  collectively  learn  through  an  appreciative  review  of  an  RCE,  (2)  to  improve transformative  learning  and  sustainability  and  (3)  to  strengthen  work  of  the  RCEs  as  a  networked  community.  There  are  six  areas  to  be  evaluated  each  with  specific  questions  to  be addressed.  These  areas  are  (1)  RCE  coordination and  networking,  (2)  activities  and  their  effects,  (3)  transformation  and  sustainability,  (4)  strategic areas  and  linkages,  (5)  Global  Service  Center  and  its  role,  and  (6)  value  creation  assessment. After  his  presentation,  Dr.  Payyappalli- mana  opened  the  floor  for  discussion  by  asking  suggestions  for  the  improvement  of  the  instrument  and  for  the  manner  of  conducting  the  assessment.  The  following  summary  points  of  the  interaction: Issues  deliberated  included  the  following: • The  assessment  model  is  an  “Open  Framework.” • Questions  are  not  definitive.  Participants can  suggest  questions  that  are  not  reflected.  Are  they  the  right  questions?  Can  they  be  simplified? • Does  the  evaluation  require  that  old  RCEs go  back  to  the  year  of  implementation for  evaluation? • What  if  there  is  a  disparity  of  the  reality  of  the  past  and  the  present?  How  is  it  reconciled? • Is  it  a  general  agreement  that  assessment is  required  for  RCEs? • RCEs  can  do  the  evaluation  beyond  what  is  suggested.  The  RCEs  are  in  the  right  position  to  determine  their  assessment. • Learning  experience  is  that  people  may have  different  perceptions  about  RCEs. • The  evaluation  is  not  by  stakeholders.  It  is  by  the  whole  RCE. • There  is  no  regular  format  for  the  conduct  of  self-evaluation. • Old  RCEs  can  go  back  and  look  afresh at  what  they  have  done  since  the  beginning  or  go  back  at  least  3  years. During  the  assessment  session,  the  following  RCEs  expressed  interest  in  conducting  self-  assessment: 1.  Srinagar  (Abdhesh  Gangwar) 2.  Northern  Mindanao  (Dexter  Lo) 3.  Bangalore  (Santosh  Sutar) 4.  Kodagu  (Santosh  Sutar) 5.  Bohol  (Bernabe  Mijares) 6.  Iskandar  (Wai  Yoke Wong) 7.  East  Arunachal  Pradesh  (Bulia  Pulu) 8.  Delhi  (Monmi) 9.  Greater  Phnom  Penh  (Nareth  Nut) 10.  Penang  (Munirah  Ghazali) 11.  Borderlands  Mexico-USA  (RCE  Candidate  -  Carolina  Lopez) After  the  discussion  and  interaction  on  the  evaluation  of  RCEs,  the meeting  proceeded with  the  awarding  of  certificates  of  honor  and  appreciation  to  the  plenary  speakers,  moderators and  presenters.  Then  there  was  a  video  presentation  of  RCE  Yogyakarta  as  initial  information  and  partial  acquaintance  of  the  venue  of  the  10th  Global  RCE  Conference. 394 Proceedings  of  the  International  Conference  on  Climate  Change,  Biodiversity  and  Ecosystem  Services  for  the Sustainable  Development  Goals  (SDGs):  Policy  and  Practice  27-29  June  2016,  Cha-am,  Phetchaburi,  Thailand


Proceedings of International Conference on Climate Change, Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services for the Sustainable Development Goals : Policy and Practice 27-29 June 2016 at the Sirindhorn International Environmental Park, Cha-am, Phetchaburi, Thailand
To see the actual publication please follow the link above